grayestofghosts: Elliot Alderson with the word hackerman superimposed (hackerman)
There was a thread recently by the admin here on twitter about issues going on at AO3. From what I understand -- and I may be confused, here -- is that there were bad actors who were using AO3 as a service and sending CSEM to people with the intention of swatting those they sent the CSEM to. AO3 of course disabled the accounts but apparently there's an issue on AO3 where when they disable accounts they do not automatically hide that account's contents, but moderators have to go through the contents manually for some reason and this may have fucked up their legal liability. Because of this, if you have anything you have posted on AO3 or have any well-loved bookmarks on AO3, I would recommend downloading them for yourself on your local machine/drives. The great thing about AO3 is that it will generate epubs and other formats for you to keep on your own devices, at least, but I understand that's probably a LOT of bookmarks for some people...

I do not know all the details but the twitter thread is here. It looks like it has had a lot of updates since I last checked and I don't have time right now to go through all the addendums but the point is -- AO3's code and policies may not have been able to meet its US legal obligations to remove illegal material in a timely manner and that could be a legal issue, so back up your work and favorites in case anything happens to the site.

At this point on the internet if you see something you like you like it's hard to know if it will be on there for much longer so just take a copy anyway. You never know when your personal archive will be necessary.

grayestofghosts: (percy)
I get home from vacation and many larger subs of Reddit have gone dark, and all I hear about is how people can't search for normal how-tos because Reddit was the big repository for actual questions answered, especially now that Yahoo Answers is gone and almost all hobby forums are gone, disappeared into either Reddit, Discord, or otherwise.

Along with Twitter’s collapse in the last 6 months or so and ChatGPT clogging up SEO with garbage, all of this seems really... bad? Like it was bad enough before with the video takeover (especially because of my disability) but that was somewhat slow-moving and ongoing since about 2016. This is all happening in the matter of months. I know the reddit blackout is temporary but this all seems to bode ill generally with the reveal on how fragile this all is.

I would love it if forums came back, but I don't love that we will probably have to become much more desperate to make the jump back to them. Also a lot of things that made forums go round was free image hosting which is mostly gone outside of social media and let's be real everyone is on mobile devices which makes image upload extremely finnicky outside of apps specialized for it... and this isn't even getting into video.

All through this collapse I'm just watching and helpless. I mean maybe I could look into starting a forum, but what would it be about? I don't trust in my moderating abilities anyway...

I just. Don't like this. Don't like this at all.

grayestofghosts: a sketch of a man reading a paper (Default)
I will not apologize to my own blog for not updating. I will not, I will not...

Anyway. Currently cupbearer twinks is off and science fiction dissociative issues story is back on. Please do not ask my logic of how I decide what projects to work on. I don't know. I have diagnosed ADHD.

I've also been looking more on neocities and retro web stuff. I have also become a bit more involved in mastodon. I am thinking I need to get into RSS somehow to keep my sanity as Twitter continues to deteriorate. It LOOKED LIKE as of December 2022 Dreamwidth was looking at becoming compatible with ActivityPub, which would mean that people would be able to subscribe to my DW on their mastodon feeds if they wanted to, which would have been VERY exciting and would probably lead to me posting here a lot more... but alas, I have no idea what DW staff are up to and they seem to implement features very slowly -- this feature was first recommended all the way back in 2018 and they were hemming and hawing about privacy features but I'm guessing Twitter blowing up kind of put a fire under them with this. I still do not know if it will ever be implemented though, or if it is, if it will happen in a timely manner. Crossing my fingers.

I am still looking into using neocities to create a more permanent home for some of my writing (primarily essays at this point) rather than just blog updates. However building a static site, though they're quite stable, is a significant time investment and it would mean having to differentiate between what I want to post where, which is difficult enough given how diffuse social media networks etc are. But still, there's something about having control. However, looking into it, I am getting seriously sidetracked by all the shiny things. Like oh, I need a good layout, do you remember tile backgrounds? I need to design a button! What about a guest book? etc. It probably doesn't help that I am getting weirdly heavy nostalgia looking at all these sites because of how much making stuff like this was my pretty early childhood (like, legit, elementary school. I had a weird childhood). The concept of smol web is so fascinating. There are so many complex retro websites designed by teenagers who weren't even alive when this stuff was the norm. I don't know. It's a lot.

I do want a lightweight web presence that I can call my own (even if it's on neocities, static pages are pretty transferable). I WILL get it working eventually. Maybe. I don't know.

For better or worse I have been getting into enneagram stuff. I am a 5, apparently, if that's not obvious from this blog. There is a lot of, uh, what I can best describe as processing going on in my life right now and this helps, maybe. Some. It's confusing. Every time I think I've figured it out it keeps pulling me back in, you know.

In the meantime I am looking for a new job and looking to move to a safer state. Even if this is constantly occupying my mind, I don't really want to talk about it, unless you can actually hook me up with remote SQL jobs. Then please contact me.

grayestofghosts: A cartoon cat looking into a coffee cup (coffee cat)
Not sure if anyone else listens to Lo Fi Girl much, but apparently something is happening? There's a new site www.lofiworld.com, though right now it will just go through to the youtube page. The youtube video is not the usual lo-fi girl, but instead a picture of a door with a calendar with April 11 2023 circled and a digital clock counting down. Right now the countdown is at about 16 hours, so we'll see what happens in about 16 hours...

I am guessing they're launching some kind of new site or service, which is... of interest? I dunno. i can't say I'm a heavy user and have mostly switched to online radio instead of lo-fi girl which is only on platforms. If they're launching online radio (which I can't imagine, who uses online radio? Nerds? Like me?) that'd be one thing, but otherwise... who knows.
grayestofghosts: a sketch of a man reading a paper (Default)
So, some updates:

I’ve finished The Once And Future King by T. H. White on audiobook, all 33 hours. My understanding is that it’s a compilation of all of his Arthurian novels, which are based off of Thomas Mallory’s Le Morte D’Arthur, which is itself meant to be something of a compilation of all Arthurian tales up to the point it was written. It was heavy-handed to say the least (but probably not as much as the originals, lol), and I was enjoying it until the conclusion of the grail quest and then it seemed to fall off quickly. The last few hours was particularly weak and moralizing, so I guess if you’re interested in reading it yourself I’d almost recommend just reading the Lancelot books and skipping Arthur entirely.

I have not getting any further on Parzival and am realizing I’m going to need to read some Tristan and probably Le Morte D’Arthur itself, which brings me to…

I am still working on the Arthurian Cupbearer Twinks fic, though it’s been going slowly for many reasons — I estimate I have about 5,000 words of it written, even though it’s not all typed. It’s evolved significantly since its inception and I *may* have something approaching a coherent story even though I really do need to figure out an outline at some point, and it definitely needs a proper title.

If anyone is interested in this project and wants to be involved in say, beta-reading or something, please feel free to contact me.
grayestofghosts: A cartoon cat looking into a coffee cup (coffee cat)
This is absolutely a matter of counting chickens before they hatch, but I have time to idly wonder as my nailpolish dries...

If I were to publish, how would I do it these days? I am not sure what I have would be a good match for traditional publication, and even if it was, the slush pile seems to be under attack by ChatGPT to the point that I'm not sure if there would be a point in trying. On the other hand, self-pub is also being overwhelmed by AI generated books. Of course the "solution" to this is generating one's own buzz, but alas, that is not something I am good at...

One thing I definitely want in the end is to be able to hold a book in my hands. I understand at this point that might involve me getting some POD copies. So would that mean a small press is out, considering a lot of those now seem to be strictly digital? I'm wondering if writing the whole thing and releasing as a serial on something like Patreon would be best? I know I just need to write it but I'm not sure my options anymore. Things have changed a lot since I poked my head out -- I haven't written much seriously since the pandemic began.
grayestofghosts: a sketch of a man reading a paper (Default)
My life has been... busy, to say the least, to the point I've been neglecting this blog, so imagine my surprise when I saw a $50 donation to my Ko-Fi, which I'm only linked to from here. Thank you, kind stranger!

I am not in any immediate financial dire straits but me and my boyfriend are thinking that as the political situation where I live is getting worse and worse that we probably need to move and that's expensive, so any little bit helps.

I'm honestly kind of baffled, though, because that was literally the first donation I've ever gotten from that link. I'm assuming, maybe, that it came from Mastodon, so I should maybe update on what I've been doing on Mastodon despite the drama of my previous instance shutting down... I've been working on what I've described there as the Arthurian Cupbearer Twinks project, for better or for worse. As of now it's a science fiction Arthurian myth riff and it's a pile of notes and ideas and I have not written any prose yet but I've mostly just been rotating knights around in my head like rotisserie chickens.

I'm a bit tired to get into it all but looking into arthurian myth it's just so... bizarre? I feel like I was raised orthogonal to these ideas in terms of culture and there's just so much that's so weird that's taken for granted because "everyone already knows" it, much like most everything else from the middle ages. The middle ages were a terribly weird time.

Anyway I keep telling people we should "go back" to dreamwidth (even though it will never happen due to the image hosting issues) considering all other social media is going down the toilet while dw keeps chugging along... so I should probably put my money where my mouth is and actually use this blog, lol.
grayestofghosts: (frankenstein)
I did promise I would repost and compile my Frankenstein essays and posts from elsewhere as I am beginning work on my Frankenstein project. I'll start out with one of my most popular posts that's not a shitpost, even though I don't think this has much place in the analysis I'm working on:

In Frankenstein none of the narrators have real interpersonal relationships with each other but instead only experience each other through parasocial ones. All their relationships are built on one-sided interactions and observations rather than true reciprocity. The creature observes the DeLaceys at a distance and only knows his creator through his research notes and builds Frankenstein’s persona that way — Frankenstein only knows the creature’s horribleness from his appearance, distant sightings and one long, uninterrupted storytelling session — and Walton only constructs Frankenstein through Frankenstein’s retelling of events and the haze of his own loneliness. We yearn for Frankenstein to be a father to the creature or Walton to be a partner to Frankenstein the same way the creature yearns for his mate. We desperately want to make these imaginary relationships somehow real and meaningful despite the impossibility of them — the desires and expectations put on these relationships before they even begin are so high that they will never be satisfied by a real person who has only just become aware of a relationship already in progress. In the end, the DeLacey’s reaction of horror to being watched for so long is the only reasonable and realistic one to a relationship like this attempting to be fulfilled. The female creature is crushed like our hopes for them under the weighty expectation to be a perfect lover before she even exists to love.


Posted on April 8th, 2022 @brain-depoistary

Anyway, since writing this I don't think my opinion has changed much on this and while it is interesting within the context of today's social media etc. I feel like the extreme isolation built by this structure of storytelling and relationships is more in support of greater points than the point in itself, though I can see how on a site like tumblr this would seem profound and go somewhat viral (not really -- as of right now 153 reblogs and 334 likes).

grayestofghosts: (frankenstein)
I suppose I don’t have to actually ask for permission from anyone here but I’m thinking at the very least reposting the literary analysis essays I’ve posted on tumblr on the novel Frankenstein here, and maybe some notes/excerpts from my large Frankenstein project here once I have any.

I saw a post on twitter wondering about when we were getting “The transmasculine Whipping Girl” and though I don’t really think this is the next Whipping Girl per se, the thesis of the project (which I was thinking of as a book, then a site, but now I’m back to book again) as being how Victor Frankenstein is widely villainized for having the same problems as modern transmasculine people, and the reason why these problems are seen as unsympathetic is because he is silenced both inside and outside the book and assumed to be incapable of having these specific problems as a man. This project was put on hold, in large part because even with JSTOR access research was very hard because I don’t know how to do it. For example, somehow even for a major character of a famous 200 year old novel, trying to search for “Victor Frankenstein Disability” only dredged up analyses of the creature as an abandoned, disabled child and nothing about the main narrator who is constantly bedridden, collapsing, hallucinating, etc. to the point of dying at 27 years old.

I know there’s still research to be done but some other writers have encouraged me to go do it anyway because I might actually be the first person to say these things. I don’t feel that’s especially likely and feel like it would be embarassing not to cite them, but maybe I should go on anyway.
grayestofghosts: (Viktor)
As the hellsite has been dying I've been up to my usual shenanigans there as long as it will hold out (my mastodon instance has been down all day) and I've found a very bizarre yet thankfully somewhat trivial discussion to get caught up in instead of the rampant -isms constantly directed at me.

The discussion is based on this very bizarre statement about Viktor from the show Arcane while people were arguing about the Jayce/Viktor ship -- and that is that Viktor is somehow "cold and professional".

I don't care if people actually ship JayVik (though the morality police coming after shippers for shipping them because of Jayce's "like a brother" comment "means it's incest coded" is deliriously stupid if it's not actually straight-up in bad faith, which I'm sure it is), but the idea that Viktor is somehow "cold and professional" is so contrary to what actually happens in the show that I'm sure we could not have watched the same thing. The guy tried to explain sneaking a near-exile into a lab as some kind of intimate tryst, he openly berated the majority-shareholder of their company, shrinks away from spotlight and shirks professional responsibility to work on personal projects, waxes openly sentimental and mournful about his impending death, and this is not even getting into the tender looks he gives Jayce at every touch that the shippers keep obsessing over. Viktor is absolutely NOT cold or professional. He has wide range of expressions and body language like the other major characters in Arcane, which is one of the show's major strengths and definitely worth analyzing. VIktor's expressions read more as passionate which is an interesting contrast to his frankly slimy habit of doing whatever he pleases when he thinks everyone around him isn't paying attention. I think if he wasn't the blorbo du jour or if the things he was doing this way were more unsympathetic in nature people would point this out more -- but as it is, people weirdly do not mention this part of his character and kind of seem to ignore it, and when wanting to find character flaws go digging in his League of Legends character profile instead.
No seriously, if I talked to the majority shareholder of my company this way my ass would be fired so fast...


Anyway, back to the original comment, "cold and professional." It's a very weird comment unsupported by the text -- we know that viewers will see what they want to see. Viktor's a man, white, in STEM, and he's one of the few characters with a thick accent and that accent has specific stereotypes associated with it. Possibly part of the 'professional' comment is due to the fact that we see essentially nothing of his personal life except a flashback and use of experimental drugs and even those are still 'sciencey'. We have certain weird assumptions about men in STEM, about emotions even in general. Anger isn't an emotion, and with a broader brush only actual tears are the sign of 'getting emotional', which we never see Viktor do. I wonder if the 'cold' comment has to do with him not being demonstrative with typical displays of affection -- while he's obviously receptive to Jayce touching him with casual affection, he never seems to initiate it himself, but that seems more evidence of some kind of culture clash or at best taken as evidence that they're not really an item, but his response is never cold

I assume there is something of a Rorschach going on here. He has a lot of cues that viewers are primed to read a certain way. Are you paying enough attention to see what's actually there?

It's like the same discussion I saw elsewhere on Tumblr earlier this week, about Daphne from Scooby-Doo weirdly enough. Every new iteration of Scooby-Doo claims that they're doing something new with Daphne, that they're making her 'actually competent' and not 'just the hot one' out of some sort of misguided 'girl power' message, failing to account for how in EVERY iteration of Scooby-Doo was competent with useful skills even if she was not as technically inclined as Velma. Instead of paying attention to anything actually occurring onscreen, she's a teenage girl who's attractive and interested in fashion -- that must be all there is to her.

With Viktor, I don't know if it's because I grew up with these kinds of guys that I know there's way more to them than what media and even they themselves may want to project -- my dad was an engineer, my grandfather was an architect, my brother tried to go into medicine, my uncle is a trekkie, I'm a programmer myself, my family a few generations back came over from central and eastern Europe, etc -- but I kind of don't think that's it, because that's not really a super common environment, and it makes me wonder about things I've experienced from others. People have such a hard time reading my emotions and expressions to the point it often feels malicious. It makes me wonder if it's a neurotypical/neurodivergent thing going on here. Apparent 'masters' of reading body language, aren't they supposed to be? Every time a new 'body language' article is published online it's about how to tell if someone's being 'deceptive', perhaps making people search for paranoid readings of bodies and expressions instead of reading the plain text right in front of them. Or maybe it's like the 'empath' trait described in other pop psych articles -- someone has already decided this person's emotions for them so there's no need to look at their actual face and body to get what they're feeling, and if they say something else, they're obviously lying.

I don't know. I may have more thoughts on this later. Something is afoot.

grayestofghosts: (percy)
Apparently the odorous man has actually purchased the hellsite, meaning that an actual exodus may happen (?), or at least that conditions there are likely to get worse and it may be beneficial to my and everyone else’s mental health to spend less time there. I mean that’s probably true anyway, I spend too much time doomscrolling and picking pointless fights there anyway. What would become the New Hotness? Tumblr? Pillowfort or Mastodon? I’m not even on the last two… we shall see.

The biggest concern about moving away from that site is that it actually allowed NSFW compared to a lot of social media now. Not sure where to follow those artists, or even how to compile them together. I wish we still had feeds and feed readers sometimes. Imagine, a daily feed of fresh fanwork smut, straifht to your inbox daily. I can dream… 
grayestofghosts: a sketch of a man reading a paper (Default)
I think what people don't get about fic genres that torture characters intentionally like h/c is how much of these genres are about the writer and reader wanting to be treated in a certain, possibly more correct way, rather than how we normally treat people who have something awful happen to them. And it's so stunningly obvious why people write it and read it when it's framed this way, yet I'm old enough to see two different generations go through a hate of it -- the first when I was younger and any kind of dwelling in this space was considered 'whining' and needing to get over oneself (checkmark for one form of this mistreatment) and now that I'm older of pretending that this stuff is too horrible to even discuss in fiction and needs to be hidden and you're a bad person for talking about it (checkmark for second form of this mistreatment).

There's a lot of focus when writing about people who are marginalized in some way -- and when you're wanting to write about yourself as one of these people you end up having to -- and that your writing is supposed to somehow propose solutions to your suffering, when me doing that is actually making me have to contemplate what sort of problems people who have had all of the problems I have had solved for them. And maybe I'm bitter, but I don't actually find that particularly comforting to think about.
grayestofghosts: a sketch of a man reading a paper (Default)
Back on the hellsite that is Twitter I saw a discussion about "why don't we go back to LiveJournal," and after all the notes about how LJ has been destroyed even if it's technically still online and how you'd really better go to DW instead, I offered to follow anyone if they posted links to their journals and directed people to mine. As of now, I have seen zero interest.

I find it a bit disappointing, to be honest. They keep saying they want to do something different and then they don't seem to even try. One of the major issues on DW is that there aren't a lot of people here, but wouldn't that be helped by, well, making an account? Following a few journals, making a few posts? I don't know. I know I'm not on here a ton but I do appreciate what I'm trying to do and try to do more of it.


Anyway, given my comments on Ao3 a couple posts ago, I figured that because I actually am keeping up with a fic now I should push it. I've been reading Cold Skins and Warm Blood by Unfried_Mouth_Wheat which is a mashup of Dracula and Frankenstein as mentioned on Tumblr a while ago. It's not the direction that I would have gone, which I only feel the need to mention because I have Opinions on Frankenstein, but I'm invested. It says it's updated on Fridays and has been updated pretty consistently, and is noted right now at 19/35 chapters, so the author may already have the whole fic written, which is good news if you're tired of getting burned on abandoned fic.



grayestofghosts: (percy)
I keep seeing posts about people wanting Ao3 to be “more like TikTok”, and aside from how horrible that sounds it sounds like aside from the constant cries for censorship, people are very confused about Ao3’s “algorithm” and are either complaining about the one it “has” (it does not have one) or that t should get one.

I don’t navigate Ao3 terribly much but uh. It is an ARCHIVE, not a LIBRARY, and people don’t understand the difference, it seems like. 


Like, there’s this fantasy among people who love media of a “library of everything, wouldn’t that be cool”  and they have heart attacks when they see librarians throw out old books, but then they finally get to a place that, for a certain measure of ‘everything’ actually does have everything, and their puny minds have no way to deal with it. And like, fine! Yes, actually, everything is overwhelming and not useful! That is literally why libraries curate! We also need a place for everything, and that’s why we have archives, and why archives aren’t libraries!

With this in mind, and the fact that Ao3 is open-source, the most logical thing to do seems like it would be to build fic libraries that do this recommendation, maybe not by algorithm, but potentially by algorithm if you were clever enough to do so. And it is very weird to see so few attempts at this. Sometime in the last 10 years or so, any kind of halfway ambitious web project became the sole territory of a few megacorporations rather than dorks trying to glue together a website from free web space and twine. Everything has been so funneled into a few websites, and they all look the same and provide the same things. 

grayestofghosts: (percy)
A very interesting episode of the podcast Hooked On Pop came out last week called Invasion of the Vibesnatchers which seemed particularly relevant to my piece on AI art generators as potential IP laundering machines. It's a very, very interesting comparison on how two similar phenomena are being dealt with in two different mediums and how, with both of them, the artists seems to lose.

Most people are not familiar with how music credits and pay works. Various methods of what might be called 'collageing' have been used in popular recorded music since forever -- from literal clips being 'sampled' and used in a new way in a new song, or melodies repeated and reinterpreted and on and on. Also, in the United States, there's a very defined structure of who owns music, and therefore who gets money every time a song is played, so when pieces of a song are used in another song who gets a cut and how is very predetermined. Because of this structure of the business, nobody wants to step on anyone else's toes too badly, so often credit will be pre-emptively awarded before there's any kind of conflict leading to lawsuit if a company thinks there might be an issue. All of this is happening under the listener's nose unless they really look for these credits. Actual disputes like over Robin Thicke's "Blurred Lines" are not common and when they do happen they're usually settled pretty quickly.

Now, an "interpolation" isn't as straightforward a copy as a sampled clip or a repeated line of melody. The example analyzed at the beginning of the podcast showed that no individual piece of the song could be considered really copied directly from the old song being credited, but given that it has a a similar instrumentation, similar structure, etc and certain parts that are relatively unique, like a repetitive whistled melody, the old song is given credit, and with that credit the owners of the credited song get some small cut of the profit of the crediting song.

Later in the episode the host reveals that interpolation credits in popular music have increased from about 10% per year before 2017 to about 20% per year afterward, and the major reason cited why is that, well, the record companies that own songs are encouraging it. There's a definite profit motive here -- when someone uses a song they already own to make something new, they will get a cut of the profit from that song, and the more vague the definition of "use" becomes, the more credits they can have, and therefore the more money they will make without having to even acquire more songs.

Now, I can make an argument against this practice due to the "modern media companies encourage homogeneous sludge" argument, but the more important note is how different the music industry is treating music credits versus how visual art credits simply do not work and allow for AI art to sneak in. If you made an AI music generator instead, made it scan top 40 hits back decades for its learning set, and then started posting the music as your own creation or as a way to get "free music", the RIAA would have your ass on a platter in less than a week.

And I am not saying this because the RIAA is 'good' -- it's not like the record companies, once they get that interpolation credit, are actually distributing that cut of profit fairly. But it's so demonstrative of how, when it comes to who makes money on art, it's entirely down to might makes right, and the only reason AI art is allowed to exist as "free art generation" is because it is taking exploiting artists who have no legal or financial power to stop them.

grayestofghosts: (percy)
I keep reading doomsday declarations about what AI art will do to actual artists and their possibility of getting paid and at this point I’m convinced that everyone writing about this is missing the point. Artists have not been paid what they’re worth for a long time, either by exploitation or outright theft of their work. The homogenized, regurgitated slopification of art — no, I’m sorry, content — has been going on forever in the form of Save The Cat making all Hollywood movies the same, the MCU taking over cinema, the Penguin Random House/Simon and Schuster merger (including a hearing where they admitted they have no idea how books get popular), the insane scheduling requirements on Instagram to get any attention whatsoever, “crunch time” ruining game creators lives, all the way down to T-shirt bots trawling Twitter. If you read Little Women, Jo gets paid about the same amount in dollars for her short story during the Civil freaking War as a writer today would get upon winning a similar contest. I’m not saying it can’t get worse, but the idea that AI will change the fact that companies and unscrupulous individuals will do anything to avoid paying artists for their work, up to and including outright theft, by convincing them and everyone else that all “art” is essentially interchangeable, is nothing new, to the point that I wonder where the fuck anyone making these statements about AI art has been for the last ten years at least.
 
Art or “Art” is not the point here. The term "AI art generators" obfuscates what these programs are actually doing, and that's laundering intellectual property.
 
For AI to do anything it needs to be trained on a large data set. So, for an AI to make “art”, it needs to be trained with a large data set of “art”, which through “learning” it can then remix trends into the images it spits out. So, the biggest, most obvious question, then, is where is this “art” it is being trained on coming from? By the image sets DALL-E generates online, it's very obvious that the art it has used in its sample is not free, based on the fact that what it is best at creating is obviously someone else's intellectual property. It can generate very reliably images including "Pikachu" or "in the style of Frank Miller", meaning that the program must have analyzed tons of images of Pikachu and by Frank Miller, and not one article I've seen talking about art generators actually notes that to use these images, the user would have to actually pay whoever owned these images and properties to use them commercially, even if the final piece being used was generated by one of these AI programs.
 
DALL-E is able to exist and pull from these images probably because it's assuming that the use of copyrighted images and properties would be protected under fair use, with the argument that it's not for commercial use and the demonstration with these commercial properties is a part of the educational or scientific value of the generated pieces. However, I could imagine a large company like Disney deciding that it did not like users creating images of Mickey Mouse at strip clubs and send a cease and desist request that all Disney properties be taken out of the learning set, which would leave users suddenly unable to make images of Darth Vader making the first pitch in Dodger Stadium or courtroom sketches of Sora being tried for manslaughter.
 
But Disney is Disney. What about everyone else? I am not a lawyer, but I think this gets both easier and harder. As long as we're discussing fair use of images, Mickey Mouse at a strip club could be argued to be a parody or criticism somehow, while, say, if a drawing I made of a flower I found in my backyard was added to the data set, it would be really hard to argue anything made with it would be parody or criticism of the original work because I'm a nobody. There would be nothing specific in that image to parody or criticize because I am not known enough to parody or criticize. The use of my artwork in the dataset would strictly be used in a straightforward, instrumental fashion, and there would be no reason for them to not use any other picture of a flower. An AI using my random artistic renderings would very likely be a violation of fair use, but because of the way AI generate their images, it may be very hard to prove that my image was used unless the AI hiccupped and left my watermark in the generated image -- thus the intellectual property laundering potential of these programs.
 
The legal issues in using an AI art generator to make commercial art would have to be argued in court. Is an image created by an AI art generator transformative or derivative? This would likely have to be argued on a case by case basis. The real meat here would be, would the individual responsible for compiling the data set for the AI also be responsible for getting permissions from artists when their art is added to the generator, because the art generated may not be sufficiently transformative? Must Disney allow Mickey Mouse to be used in the generator because of the likelihood of the generated work being parody, or can it disallow Mickey's addition to these data sets outright? What are the implications of this for other artists? Etc.
 
Honestly I think the misunderstanding of the actual problems with these AI art generators is not because people don't understand how AI works (even though they don't), but because they don't understand how copyright and intellectual property work. While the DMCA has changed this slightly, it's still very rare for randos on the internet to get smacked for misusing or stealing art they find online while the legal system has been coping with integrating new technology doing copyright infringement since copyright has existed. The people freaking out definitely seem like they have never had to deal with purchasing a stock image or getting permission for music sampling.
 
The idea that there's no humans involved with creating AI art beyond the user typing input is just demonstrably false. If I type in Frank Miller into a generator and it creates something Frank Miller-esque, then Frank Miller was involved with the creation of it. If these generators have not already paid the artists for the data they've trained their AI on, then it's extremely likely we have another Napster on our hands. I don't think comparing AI generated art to music streaming is actually a bad comparison -- it could be very bad for artists in the end, but in a totally different way than the initial doomsayers claimed. It's easy to imagine people who were already stealing art putting the art through an AI to tweak it to make it more difficult for artists to find and send them a DMCA takedown. It's easy to imagine AI generated art replacing stock images in many cases, and the artists that produce stock getting a smaller and smaller cut because, while their images are being used, they're only being used "in part" so the companies facilitating this decide they deserve less money for it. I can even imagine a far future where the final product of art is so untouched by human hands because all human-made art goes into the art-slush and what is wanted by the consumer is pulled out as needed, but the original human-made art was still necessary. It's hard for me to imagine AI generated art replacing huge swaths of the art market with "free" art where it wasn't before, because the US government has prevented that from happening repeatedly -- from photocopiers, to VCRs, to Napster, ad nauseum. The toes being stepped on by these generators are too big to ignore.
grayestofghosts: (Viktor)
I have, again, not written much, haha. I am still feeling out this idea and am thinking of integrating stuff from my DnD character(s) concept(s) because... while I have gotten so involved in current DnD character creation, I an always disappointed by how little of it I actually get to play because DnD by nature is a slow game, everyone else has their plans, we have limitations as to how well we can play our characters, even, and there's always a significant amount of randomness.

So why not? Why shouldn't I just steal ideas from my DnD ideas and put them into my fiction?

Well... I'm always worried about cross-contamination. What I write and how I write is so different from DnD (nothing wrong with that), that I'm worried I'll change my ideas so much but still have them connected in my head and get them confused... this is possibly a silly idea, that I should be able to keep them straight, that ultimately I am only playing DnD ~4 hrs per week and the rest of the time my brain can be full of whatever writing garbage I like, but still, it can be hard to convince myself of this.

Two Pages

Aug. 13th, 2022 11:03 pm
grayestofghosts: (Viktor)
I wrote two pages tonight and don't like where this is going. I have no idea what I'm doing, and may want to actually have an idea before I write. I don't know.

It's something, maybe. I don't know.

One Page

Aug. 10th, 2022 10:46 pm
grayestofghosts: (Viktor)
So I wrote one page in the notebook today, which is much more than I had been doing previously. It's something! I don't know if I will keep it! I don't know if this is what I want to do!

I am wondering if I am going to run into the same wall I did with the last piece I had attempted which had some similar themes but really, really did not go anywhere. I kind of feel like I'm dissociating. The feeling of observing the observer, that you're just too mechanical and you can see all the parts of it working and you do not understand where the perspective is coming from, that you can maybe feel the underpinnings whir and rattle (or gush or pump, as the organic machines of our bodies may be) away and you know you should not know this and yet you do and what are the consequences of this awareness but a problem is that when I start getting mired in these experiences they keep happening, and I need to know them to keep writing them, and even though they come on their own maybe they are extended through writing, or maybe thinking about them causes them.

Yes I do have a therapist but she has been really bad about responding to me and I haven't been great about responding to her. I'll... definitely text her again to see if she has an opening soon. I don't know. I do not know why this is happening, when things are relatively good for me right now. It's also so much whenever I try to look it up and see this stuff as considered as a coping mechanism for capital-T Trauma and whatnot. I don't know. I'm tired, and it's too late to have these thoughts.
grayestofghosts: (Viktor)
I'm trying to write again, after... so much starting and stopping over the pandemic. I suppose I should not feel like I haven't done anything as I managed to write a whole 18,000 word piece of fanfiction back in like, March, and I've been writing tons of snippets off and on for the last two years including multiple Frankenstein projects. It's... uncomfortable. I feel like I have no idea what I'm doing. I got the fancy leuchtturm and fountain pen and everything to see if I can feel it and I'm not, but maybe it's just a muscle I do not have right now. I don't know.

However what I thought was funny was the published news on "necrobiotics", or the repurposing of dead tissue for robotics, with the proof-of-concept being using a pump pierced into a dead spider as a gripping tool. This normally wouldn't be funny except that about last week I was coming up with one of the concepts I was working on now, which was a mech suit made for a human that could run for about a month or so after the wearer had died, or could perhaps be rigged up to run with a corpse to begin with. The original idea was about insuring the investment of the mech suit but this paper kind of makes it sound a little more believable why this would work, if not still disturbing.



Anyway, if you're curious on the fanfiction it's a Critical Role/Legend of Vox Machina piece called Trust Exercises. Mostly Percy and Pike, though not as a ship.

Profile

grayestofghosts: a sketch of a man reading a paper (Default)
Louis Chanina

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
7 8910111213
14151617181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 07:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios