grayestofghosts: an enamel pin that reads "yikes" (yikes)
My therapist wanted me to read Andrea Long Chu's Females for a while and on my way to buy it online something totally wacky happened. I stumbled upon a reddit post about this critical review of the book by a trans woman. The review seems pretty typical, praising Chu for being interesting while at the same time critical of her perspectives and cast them as misogynist, absurd, projecting, nonsense, a "harmful" narrative to trans people, and generally un-transfeminist... essentially a pretty shallow reading of it and closely toeing the "party line" of public-facing transgender narrative at the time it was written, back in 2019.

This would all be quite unremarkable, except in the interim, the book critic has since detransitioned, claims he was "immersed in transgender ideology" which encouraged him to transition because of his "autogynephilia" and has even converted to Catholicism. Andrea Long Chu, meanwhile, is still Andrea Long Chu-ing.
grayestofghosts: a sketch of a man reading a paper (Default)
A few days ago I went thrift shopping with my boyfriend and ended up looking at the women's blazers because I may need something for interviews and going out and sometimes women's are more interesting and I can fit into the larger ones. We found this navy blue and black brocaded tuxedo jacket and it was $15 and fit me and so I had to get it. As we checked it over we found the tag on the inside that said had its designer that read "FOR MEN" on it... it was actually a men's jacket, but because it was interesting and a bit flashy, had automatically been flagged as a women's garment and put all the way on the other side of the store in the women's section, while the men's garments maintained a very strict conformity of things that men were 'supposed' to wear.

I get that the Savers staff are very busy and sorting through lots and lots of clothing, and it's something of a cliche to say that "this says a lot about society" but also, this says a lot about society, I think.
grayestofghosts: a sketch of a man reading a paper (Default)
It occurs to me that whenever women who are sick of "men writing women" attempt to reverse it and write about men the way men write about women, the way they write is identical to how transgender men are written about. See this example posted to Reddit:





It's hard to explain how infuriating it is that whenever there are any transmasculine complaints about anything, it's always framed as a vicious hatred of women for... telling them that these sorts of shallow things they think 'gets back at the patriarchy' somehow is stuff they already do to us all the time. The worst offense there is is really telling people their fun isn't funny, huh.
grayestofghosts: (haruka)
So I just saw the monthly "Is Haruka/Sailor Uranus genderfluid" post on Reddit and they're at it again, arguing about how gender works in Japan vs the west and lots of quibbling over terminology of what did or did not exist in 1994 when the character was invented.

I think it's very tiring to read this because regardless of the creator's intent, Haruka Ten'oh is probably the clearest, unambiguous, most simply read genderfluid character I've seen in a lot of media. Sometimes Haruka is a girl, and sometimes Haruka is a boy, and she's enough of a girl that she's in the 'girl only' group of sailor scouts, but also enough of a boy that she lives through her private school system as a boy in a boy's uniform without any of this presentation being questioned. This is different in the anime, apparently, which I have not seen all of, where she clearly denies being a boy at some point, but in the manga the read is startlingly unambiguous, and the waffling is from people who deny that gender fluidity is possible or real, and want to couch her existence in safer terms, like 'really' being a girl who likes to dress in boy's clothing.

And, like... I do think there's a huge cop out here when labeling characters as 'only' butch lesbians vs genderfluid, transgender, etc. Because the pervasive labeling of a character like Haruka as a butch lesbian is never a real analysis of her identity but always couched in making her safer and simpler to understand to a cis audience, when this is not the reality that actual butch lesbians who are actively read as men in real life situations experience. The 'only a woman in man's clothing' has been a label to soothe cis people and has not protected butch lesbians from gendered and sexual violence for their existence and does not necessarily reflect their views on their own genders. There's multiple writings by butches on how they don't feel like women, and they feel like men forced to live in some kind of liminal space or otherwise not women, and how they feel like they can't actually express this. This is not to discount possible butches who do see themselves as women in men's clothing, but to shove off a character into the category of 'butch' does not mean that they are devoid of gendered feelings, complexity, and interiority that would make a cis audience uncomfortable, and Haruka's actions do demonstrate that whether the audience likes it or not, regardless of any vocabulary used. Gendered subcultures like butch, genderfluid, nonbinary, etc are historically very fluid but this does not mean the formalized gender is correct, just that it is a forced choice forced by a society that cannot tolerate ambiguity.

I'd call Sailor Uranus genderfluid but she could be read as butch. But she's not 'just' butch. She's not 'just' anything.
grayestofghosts: a sketch of a man reading a paper (reading)
 Note: this is partially from a Tumblr post yesterday that I’ve since added to.

I am becoming increasingly frustrated with how, when I go to the library, the fiction seems to be divided up into “girl books” and “boy books”, and I don’t think it’s that this is at all new but that there are  many more “girl books” now released that it’s become more noticeable. The “boy books” are written by men with practiced blindness do not acknowledge gender as a factor in them at all as gender is dictated by society as Not The Purview of Men And They Are Therefore Exempt From Any Understanding Lest Anyone Think Them Kinda Faggy, and the “girl books” are entirely about how women are treated badly in Society Because They Are Women And Not Men, And This Is The Only Gender Conflict That Matters. I have read much of both types of books — because they’re like 95% of all books — and find neither relatable at all. I am sick of both of them and they seem to take up the entirety of the bookstore and once I understood this it’s nearly destroyed my love of reading. Every single book I pick up is about a totally alien planet inhabited by complete strangers who find my very existence offensive to their sense of reality. And this is my real life, too, and it’s why I still try to write despite the fact that I struggle to read so much.

And I can’t say it’s because I only desire to read books about myself and people exactly like me, because, again, nearly all I’ve read has been either girl or boy books. A decent amount of my reading list has been romance novels because it’s one of the only genres out there where men can have genders and this can be good, which is one of my major complaints of “girl books” otherwise — and it’s bizarre that romance novels are constantly belittled and segregated into “wish fulfillment” whereas the woman-solidarity endemic to “darker” stories is equally as fantastical as men with genders existing and that possibly being good. 

And you’d think that with so many queer books coming out now I’d be more engaged but I’m not, because so often it’s used as an excuse to further segregate boyness and girlness in books rather than cross any barriers. And I do feel like there are huge issues with a lot of the transmasculine books that have been published, but mostly in that they’re entirely presented in a way that’s palatable to the public, and it’s maybe not a them problem but a me problem in how it’s even more painful to read a book that’s supposed to be ‘like me’ only to realize it’s not ‘like me’ at all and it’s merely ‘about me’ except it’s not accurate to me, specifically, at all. 

I continue to write but unfortunately so much of what I read has gone into classics and that makes me feel unable to engage at all with traditional publishing and the industry. I’d like to read other things but somehow it’s easier to read things that you know are steeped in metaphor you can reinterpret rather than… girl books and boy books. 

Profile

grayestofghosts: a sketch of a man reading a paper (Default)
Louis Chanina

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
8910 11 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 02:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios